May 14, 2024

An expert has issued a stark warning about the threat of nuclear war, claiming that “no matter how it starts, it ends with everyone dead”.

Annie Jacobsen, who has authored several best-selling books on America’s military, including studies of top-secret research lab DARPA and the infamous Area 51, says that in the event of a Russian or Chinese missile launch being detected, the US president would have just six minutes to make a crucial decision.

Do they retaliate – leading inevitably to the deaths of almost the entire world population – or allow one of America’s cities to be wiped off the map?

READ MORE: Mathematician warns world is at risk of being obliterated – because of five men

To learn more about the threat of nuclear conflict with Russia, read of the Daily Star’s coverage here.

She told podcaster Lex Fridman the current US doctrine of “launch on warning” means that retaliation would take place before there was time to ask questions about why the initial alert had been triggered.



The moment that America’s satellites detected a launch, the six-minute countdown would start

“We are one misunderstanding, one miscalculation away from nuclear Armageddon and no matter how nuclear war starts, it ends with everyone dead,” she said.

“The US Defense Department has a early warning system. And the system in space is called SBIRS, a constellation of satellites that is keeping an eye on all of America’s enemies.”

“So the moment an ICBM launches, they see the hot rocket exhaust on the ICBM a fraction of a second after it launches. And so there begins this horrifying policy called launch on warning, and that’s the US counterattack.

“The reason that the United States is so ferociously watching for a nuclear launch somewhere around the globe is so that the nuclear command and control system in the US can move into action to immediately make a counterstrike.

“That policy, launch on warning, is exactly like it says, it means the United States will not wait to absorb a nuclear attack. It will launch nuclear weapons in response before the bomb actually hits.”



300mph winds would send hundreds of people flying skyward in the mushroom cloud
300mph winds would send hundreds of people flying skyward in the mushroom cloud

In more than one occasion in the past, the order has been given for Russian or American forces to launch a nuclear strike, only for it later to emerge that the command was issued in error. We may not be so lucky next time.

Annie adds that at least one former US president has expressed doubts that it’s rational to unleash Armageddon based on a blip on a radar screen.

“The best sort of hitting the nail on the head statement is in President Reagan’s memoirs,” she said.

“He refers to the six-minute window and calls it irrational. He says, ‘How can anyone make a decision to launch nuclear weapons based on a blip on a radar scope?'”



Ronald Reagan called the US deterrent doctrine 'irrational'
Ronald Reagan called the US deterrent doctrine ‘irrational’

She points out that unlike what we see in the movies, a nuclear missile cannot be recalled or diverted once the launch button has been pushed – something President Reagan himself didn’t know.

The effects of a nuclear explosion are still not widely understood she says, and the resulting mushroom cloud would pull in people from miles around and hurl them into the sky as they burned to death – with the horror being repeated in cities across the world.

“The United States has 1,770 nuclear weapons deployed, meaning those weapons could launch in as little as 60 seconds and up to a couple minutes. Some of them on the bombers might take an hour or so,” she said.

Russia has 1,674 deployed nuclear weapons, same scenario, their weapon systems are on par with ours. That’s not to mention the 12,500 nuclear weapons amongst the other nine nuclear-armed nations.”

When the weapons detonate, 300mph winds would cause carnage, she says.

“You’re talking about people miles out getting sucked up into that stem. When you see the mushroom cloud, that would be people,” she said.



Annie says that a nuclear exchange could cost up to five billion lives
Annie says that a nuclear exchange could cost up to five billion lives

She says that she interviewed dozens of major political and military figures about the concept of nuclear deterrents, and they all agreed on one detail.

“Every source I interviewed for this book, from former Secretaries of Defence, nuclear sub force commanders, Stratcom commanders, FEMA directors, nuclear weapons engineers, they all shared with me the common denominator that nuclear war is insane,” she said.

If a US president made that fateful decision to strike back, countless lives would be snuffed out in less time than it takes to play a game of football

“First millions, then tens of millions, then hundreds of millions of people will die in the first 72 minutes of a nuclear war.

“And then comes nuclear winter where the billions then die from starvation.”